Quoddy Issues - LNG![]() |
|
| LNG IN PASSAMAQUODDY BAY Subscribe to the LNG Listserve |
Resources |
The Rights of Innocent Passage Debate Cliff Goudey, MIT The U.S. State
Department's position regarding rights of innocent passage are
debatable enough based both on the properties of LNG and the size of
the proposed vessels. However, the dependence of their
arguments
on
the Law of the Sea Convention (which the U.S. has failed to ratify) and
the presumption that the waters in question are Territorial Seas (which
they are not) shows their analysis is flawed. The
rights of
innocent passage do not apply to internal waters. See: Definition
of
Internal waters Internal
waters are
defined as waters on the landward side of the
1.
Ports; change the fact that Canada can just say no. LNG Tankers Are Getting Bigger The current size of LNG tankers is about 290 meters, much larger than local coastal freighters that use our Quoddy ports. These average about 170 - 180 metres. Some new LNG Tankers will be over 300 metres. These are larger than some VLCCs. Get all the facts here LNG at Saint John vs LNG at Passamaquoddy Bay We believe that
Passamaquoddy Bay is
the wrong place for LNG facilties. We have taken no position on LNG at
other locations. However, we keep hearing criticism
from
folks who can't see any difference between LNG at Saint John Harbour
and LNG in Passamaquoddy Bay. Apart from the richness of the Quoddy
Region and the financial losses that will occur, the approaches are so
different that it is clear that these critics have not bothered to do a
little reseach.
Access to Saint John Harbour is characterized by a direct, safe, unobstructed route from the Outer Bay of Fundy to the Harbour. Traffic lanes have been moved to avoid principal Right Whale areas. The Harbour has been active since the City was founded and has modern navigation, security, and safety systems in place. Approaches to Saint John Harbour (Click image for full sized view) In contrast, the route to Passamaquoddy Bay passes through a Right Whale Sanctuary, vital fishing and aquaculture grounds, and the primary tourist area for the Bay of Fundy (see the slide show at www.scep.org/LNG). It follows a difficult, narrow, and dangerous passage through upwellings, extreme currents, the Old Sow Whirlpool, and into Passamaquoddy Bay a vital area for tourism, endangered species, research, education and the home of numerous historic and protected sites including St. Croix island an international historic site. There are very limited navigation, security, and safety systems in place. Additionally, the proposed terminals are all sited along the Canada and US Border, increasing security risks in an area which should act as a buffer zone. This is not an area where foreign ships and crews should be passing between our two countries under current circumstances. A quick look at the Google aerials should be adequate to satisfy the most difficult critic. Approaches
to Passamaquoddy Bay
(Click image for full sized view) ![]() Approaches to Port Hawksbury/Bear Island, NS (Click image for full sized view) ![]() Please note above the high values at Robbinston and Pleasant Point areas, both proposed LNG locations. THIRD TERMINAL PROPOSED NEAR DEVIL'S HEAD Proposed LNG terminals and Tank Farms in relation to St. Croix Island International Park and Passamaquoddy Bay from the Ganong Nature & Marine Park. A NEW THIRD PROPOSAL HAS A SITE NEAR HERE TO THE LOWER RIGHT OF THE PHOTO. |
Quick
Links
LNG Facts and Resources
********** **********
|
| Produced
by Art
MacKay
Studios Copyright 2005-2006. All rights reserved |
|